Skip to content

Example of using LAPACK in post_process #939

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sbryngelson
Copy link
Member

This is an example of how one would use LAPACK in post_process. It isn't intended to be merged; it is just a static example of how to do this.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.05128% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.79%. Comparing base (adcc0dd) to head (a1e9092).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/post_process/m_lapack_example.f90 81.08% 6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #939      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.71%   43.79%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          68       69       +1     
  Lines       18360    18399      +39     
  Branches     2292     2293       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         8026     8058      +32     
- Misses       8945     8951       +6     
- Partials     1389     1390       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant